It cracks me up to see so many people who think that having a good general culture is a crucial thing. They believe they should know all sorts of stuff on a wide range of subjects including literature, art, history, geography and politics.

Personally, I couldn’t have a poorer general culture (although I do tend to create the peculiar impression that I know a lot of stuff). My standard answer to a question such as “When did Napoleon invade Russia?” is, depending on my mood, either “On a beautiful morning” or “Don’t know, don’t care”.

Furthermore, as I don’t try to improve in this area, you can imagine I don’t give general culture a lot of value, as opposite to the high value I give good people skills. Here’s why:

General Culture Is Not Practical Knowledge

Most of the knowledge considered to be a part of your general culture has a practical use that stops at superficial conversation. Beyond that, there isn’t much you can do with it. When did knowing the best neoclassical painters practically help for someone, apart from a guide in an art museum?

Sure, there are principles and concepts in various fields that are of practical use to us in everyday life. I believe it’s good to know about the Pareto Principle or the best social media websites. However, that’s not the kind of knowledge general culture is mostly about.

Skills Trample Knowledge

I think I say something like this almost every day: quit reading; start doing! Even practical knowledge has little value if it’s not assimilated and developed into a skill or an attitude. This assimilation process is not based on reading, it’s based on practicing.

It is your skills and attitudes that make you a successful professional, a charismatic person or a great leader; not your general culture. And developing skills effectively means, in my experience, about 5% absorbing information and 95% applying it repeatedly.

This is why it doesn’t surprise me that the most cultured people I know are fairly unsuccessful.

General Culture Makes Boring Conversation

Have you taken part lately in a conversation on German poetry or something like that? Whenever I am, my mind is screaming: “Get me out of here!” and I obey it. It’s no wonder that such conversations are habitually called ‘small talk’.

I find that a conversation on a particular subject in the area of general culture is only interesting if all the persons involved have a strong interest and thirst for knowledge on that particular subject. This, of course, rarely happens. Like it on not, many people would rather discuss relationships than the political system in Ethiopia.

If You Think It Makes You Interesting, You’re in for a Big Surprise

Another idea I consider outdated is that demonstrating a vast general culture will impress others, because it is a very attractive trait.

First of all, the only people you’re gonna truly impress are my grandma and her girlfriends. Secondly, if you want to play this angle, there are a lot more attractive traits than knowing a lot of shit. Consider traits like wits, confidence, people skills and authenticity; these are the ones that give you an edge in social interactions.

It Gets Worse

That part of me that provides communication coaching for a living can’t help but notice that many times, using your general culture as the base in making conversation is a way of hiding oneself. If you’re talking about stuff, you’re not talking putting yourself out there. That doesn’t make you charming, it makes you boring.

I’m sure that at one point in our history, knowing the history of many countries was a very important thing. I suspect it was a way to separate the upper class from the common people who didn’t even have access to that kind of knowledge.

Today on the other hand, general culture, at least in the traditional way of defining it, doesn’t do squat for you. Maybe that’s a sign we need to either leave this concept behind, or reinvent it.

Image courtesy of practicalowl